After an unfortunate two weeks where I was lost in Nyquil-land and not paying as much attention as I should have, I just finished a pass checking over all the open 26 CommitFest items. Just under 50% of the patches that were open at the start of the CF are still hanging around, with 6 in "Ready for Committer" and the rest split evently waiting for reviewers or the author. A few larger patches or patch sets deserve some commentary.

The multi-part Extensions patch continues to chug along. A committer needs to pick up "pg_execute_from_file()" next to keep progress on that series going, as the other two remaining patches depend on it (and may need to be rebased after it goes in). Help is also needed on coding review of the main "Extensions" patch. The as yet untouched "ALTER EXTENSION ... SET SCHEMA ..." is the last patch in the set to apply, and while it needs a reviewer eventually I don't think that's the blocking point on the general extension work yet.

As for the also large SQL/MED set, I'm not sure whether it's posible to get review work started on its two dependent components--"file_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw"--until the main patch is finished off. Given the size of code involved, it wouldn't surprise me if everyone is still be chewing on that series into the next CF. Glad to see it all submitted for this one though.

Most of the remaining patches that are in "Needs Review" have already gone through one round of review. There are two notable exceptions. While some libpq work has been getting finished for Sync Rep, neither of the two main patches for that have received any love for almost two months now. This is the spot where I start to get worried about seeing this finish for 9.1. I'm now trying to find time to work on those; anybody else need this feature who can help?

--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    g...@2ndquadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support        www.2ndQuadrant.us



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to