Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-02-11 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Hi, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: > Greg Smith írta: > >> 4) Investigate and be explicit about the potential breakage here both >> for libpq clients and at least one additional driver too. If I saw a >> demonstration that this didn't break the JDBC driver, for example, I'd >> feel a lot better abou

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-01-28 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > Waiting for Re-Review (5) > = > Writeable CTEs Set this ready for commit. For such a small patch, it's a wonderful feature. I think it deserves a fair shot on this 'fest. insert/returning/subquery is far and away one of

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-01-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas escribió: > Furthermore, if we are going to ever change this in an incompatible > way that may break clients, isn't 9.0 exactly the right time to do > that? If that doesn't scream "big changes coming, proceed with > caution", I don't know what would. I agree with this -- if we're eve

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-01-28 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> plpython3 - no reviewer yet > > This whole feature seems quite interesting, and I'm really impressed at how > much work James has put into rethinking what a Python PL should look like. >  But isn't the fact that there isn'

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-01-28 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Hi, Greg Smith írta: >> Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs > > I think I can write a review for this one right now based on the > discussion that's already happened: > > -Multiple people think the feature is valuable and it seems worth > exploring > -The right way to handle the protocol change h

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-01-27 Thread Greg Smith
Robert Haas wrote: Waiting for Initial Review (4) == plpython3 - no reviewer yet This whole feature seems quite interesting, and I'm really impressed at how much work James has put into rethinking what a Python PL should look like. But isn't the fact that there isn

Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-01-27 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Robert Haas wrote: Some of the perl patches have not yet been reviewed either, but I'm a little less concerned about those because it seems that Andrew is working on those anyway: still, if anyone feels inclined to volunteer, I believe Andrew has said he would appreciate another pair of eyes.

[HACKERS] CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

2010-01-27 Thread Robert Haas
We have 20 remaining patches to deal with for the 2010-01 CommitFest. I've attempted to break down the status of these patches below. The good news is that almost half of the remaining patches are either already marked as Ready for Committer, or have already been reviewed once and will likely be m