On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am impressed at the state of the May wiki patch queue:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:May
It is even tracking the psql wrap patch I am working on now.
Thanks. We've
Brendan Jurd escribió:
I wonder if we should namespace the CommitFest pages by year as well
as month (i.e., move CommitFest:May to CommitFest:May2008). This way,
even after we've had a CommitFest:May in 2009/2010/etc., the history
of the May 2008 CommitFest will still be easily viewable as a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan Jurd escribió:
I wonder if we should namespace the CommitFest pages by year as well
as month (i.e., move CommitFest:May to CommitFest:May2008). This way,
even after we've had a CommitFest:May in
Brendan Jurd wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan Jurd escribió:
I wonder if we should namespace the CommitFest pages by year as well
as month (i.e., move CommitFest:May to CommitFest:May2008). This way,
even after we've had a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use a form for posting new patches that would automatically put it
on the right page? (I have no idea if you can do that sort of thing using
mediawiki - it's just what I would do if I were designing a patch
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Brendan Jurd wrote:
I wonder if we should namespace the CommitFest pages by year as well
as month (i.e., move CommitFest:May to CommitFest:May2008).
This already came up on pgsql-www and as I just replied to over there, the
current structure has some things I'd like to
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:54:16 +1000
Brendan Jurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being able to submit patches via a web form is one of the more obvious
benefits of a real patch tracker. I'm not aware of any way to
accomplish this in mediawiki without resorting to some nasty script
hackery.
We could
Brendan Jurd wrote:
I wonder if we should namespace the CommitFest pages by year as well
as month (i.e., move CommitFest:May to CommitFest:May2008). This way,
even after we've had a CommitFest:May in 2009/2010/etc., the history
of the May 2008 CommitFest will still be easily viewable as a
Bruce Momjian escribió:
Brendan Jurd wrote:
I wonder if we should namespace the CommitFest pages by year as well
as month (i.e., move CommitFest:May to CommitFest:May2008). This way,
even after we've had a CommitFest:May in 2009/2010/etc., the history
of the May 2008 CommitFest will
