Brendan Jurd wrote:
But I also agree with Josh Drake's comment about a single point of
entry. If patch authors are updating the wiki, and reviewers are
using the wiki to guide their efforts, what purpose does the -patches
mailing list serve? Does sending an email to -patches on top of
It's not clear how this commitfest thing is supposed to work in
practice. May I suggest that:
1. When a patch author wants to have a patch reviewed in the next
commitfest, he posts it to pgsql-patches as usual, and then adds it to
the list on the Todo:PatchStatus page (or perhaps even better,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:33:02 +
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not clear how this commitfest thing is supposed to work in
practice. May I suggest that:
1. When a patch author wants to have a patch reviewed in the next
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:33:02 +
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not clear how this commitfest thing is supposed to work in
practice. May I suggest that:
1. When a patch author wants to have a patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
that's true at least for me. If
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
that's true at least for me. If I want people to
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
that's true at least for me. If
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The main point of my proposal is: let's make the *authors* who want
their stuff to be reviewed as part of a commitfest do the extra work.
There would be no extra work required for patch reviewers.
I think this makes the most sense. It distributes the work to
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The main point of my proposal is: let's make the *authors* who want
their stuff to be reviewed as part of a commitfest do the extra work.
There would be no extra work required for patch reviewers.
I agree with Heikki that for the process to be successful, it should
Andrew Chernow wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The main point of my proposal is: let's make the *authors* who want
their stuff to be reviewed as part of a commitfest do the extra work.
There would be no extra work required for patch reviewers.
I think this makes the most sense. It
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
If I want people to review my patch, I'm ready to sing and dance if
that's what it takes.
Great timing, there's even a suitable song available for you today:
http://use.perl.org/~grantm/journal/35855
--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane wrote:
This is reasonable for the sort of medium-to-large patch that the author
has put a lot of time into. But we also get a lot of small one-off
patches where it's not so reasonable. Now of course many of those get
applied right away, but not all. One of the services that Bruce's
This is reasonable for the sort of medium-to-large patch that the author
has put a lot of time into. But we also get a lot of small one-off
patches where it's not so reasonable. Now of course many of those get
applied right away, but not all.
Just a thought... maybe a distinction should
On 08/03/2008, Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know that's
true at least for me. If I want people to review my patch, I'm ready to
sing and dance if
15 matches
Mail list logo
