Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IE I'd like to have the information come back as say a notice or maybe
> > as extra information for an EXPLAIN for my purposes, but unless there is
> > interest, consensus on how it should be done, and a TODO item made of
> > it,
Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IE I'd like to have the information come back as say a notice or maybe
> as extra information for an EXPLAIN for my purposes, but unless there is
> interest, consensus on how it should be done, and a TODO item made of
> it, I won't be making a patch
Tom Lane wrote:
>Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Also I'd also like to know if there is a way to get the planner to burp
>>out all the possible plans it considered before selecting a final plan
>>or do I need to do a little surgery to get that done?
>>
>
>You can define OPTIMIZ
Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also I'd also like to know if there is a way to get the planner to burp
> out all the possible plans it considered before selecting a final plan
> or do I need to do a little surgery to get that done?
You can define OPTIMIZER_DEBUG but the interface
OK I know it's been beaten nearly to death, but no clear action has come
of it quite yet. We all seem to agree that there is some non-optimal
way in which the planner handles edge cases (cost wise). I don't
believe that there are any fundamental type faults in any of the logic
because we'd h
