On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.frwrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I believe the reason GIST has compress/decompress functions is not for
TOAST (they predate that, if memory serves), but to allow the on-disk
representation of an index entry
On 11.10.2013 17:39, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangashlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
2. I didn't understand this change:
@@ -422,24 +439,14 @@ g_cube_union(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
g_cube_compress(PG_FUNCTION_**ARGS)
{
-
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 11.10.2013 17:39, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangashlinnakangas@**
vmware.com hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
2. I didn't understand this change:
@@
Alexander Korotkov aekorot...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
I guess it can't happen. Or is it possible that a toasted value that came
from disk will be passed to these functions, without detoasting them
somewhere along
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
I believe the reason GIST has compress/decompress functions is not for
TOAST (they predate that, if memory serves), but to allow the on-disk
representation of an index entry to be different from the data type's
normal representation in other ways --- think
On 09.10.2013 21:07, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Stas Kelvichstas.kelv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
There is new version of patch. I have separated ordering operators to different
patch (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1243), fixed
formatting
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
2. I didn't understand this change:
@@ -422,24 +439,14 @@ g_cube_union(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
g_cube_compress(PG_FUNCTION_**ARGS)
{
- PG_RETURN_DATUM(PG_GETARG_**DATUM(0));
+ GISTENTRY
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Stas Kelvich stas.kelv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
There is new version of patch. I have separated ordering operators to
different patch
(https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1243), fixed
formatting issues and implemented backward
Hello
There is new version of patch. I have separated ordering operators to different
patch (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1243), fixed
formatting issues and implemented backward compatibility with old-style points
in cube_is_point() and cube_out().
Also comparing
On 12.07.2013 14:57, Stas Kelvich wrote:
Hello.
here is a patch adding to cube extension support for compressed representation
of point cubes. If cube is a point, i.e. has coincident lower left and upper
right corners, than only one corner is stored. First bit of the cube header
indicates
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Stas Kelvich stas.kelv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello.
here is a patch adding to cube extension support for compressed
representation of point cubes. If cube is a point, i.e. has coincident
lower left and upper right corners, than only one corner is stored. First
11 matches
Mail list logo