Re: [HACKERS] Darwin compile fixes

2005-10-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Attached is a cleaned up version of the patch (without wrapping). The > > change is to use "$(CXX) $(CFLAGS)" instead of $(COMPILER). Does this > > change break OS/X? > > Since our configure doesn't define CXX, I'm having a hard time imagining > how i

Re: [HACKERS] Darwin compile fixes

2005-10-12 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Attached is a cleaned up version of the patch (without wrapping). The > change is to use "$(CXX) $(CFLAGS)" instead of $(COMPILER). Does this > change break OS/X? Since our configure doesn't define CXX, I'm having a hard time imagining how it could fail to break it. If

[HACKERS] Darwin compile fixes

2005-10-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 10:36, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > Is libpq.dylib getting built? Is it there and just not being found? If > > so, you may need the LDFLAGS/CFLAGS settings from: > > > > http://darwinports.opendarwin.org/darwinports/dports/databases/postgresql8/Por