Le Monday 21 July 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit :
> Cédric Villemain wrote:
> > Le Monday 21 July 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit :
> >> I think we should differentiate between "infinite" and "unknown" in the
> >> return value of get_stack_depth_limit(), and use max_stack_depth of 2MB
> >> in c
Cédric Villemain wrote:
Le Monday 21 July 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit :
I think we should differentiate between "infinite" and "unknown" in the
return value of get_stack_depth_limit(), and use max_stack_depth of 2MB
in case of infinite, and fall back to the 100kB only in the unknown case.
Le Monday 21 July 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit :
> In 8.2, we started to use getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, ...) to set
> max_stack_depth automatically, to a max of 2MB:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg00389.php
>
> However, it's not behaving as I expected when the stack li
Tom Lane wrote:
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In 8.2, we started to use getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, ...) to set
max_stack_depth automatically, to a max of 2MB:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg00389.php
However, it's not behaving as I expected when the
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In 8.2, we started to use getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, ...) to set
> max_stack_depth automatically, to a max of 2MB:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg00389.php
> However, it's not behaving as I expected when the stack limit i
In 8.2, we started to use getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, ...) to set
max_stack_depth automatically, to a max of 2MB:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg00389.php
However, it's not behaving as I expected when the stack limit is set to
"unlimited". I would expect max_stack_depth to
