On 11 October 2012 20:28, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Not many RULE-lovers out there, once you've tried to use them.
Allowing RULEs complicates various things and can make security more
difficult.
What exactly do they make more difficult? Are you particularly
concerned with the
On 10/11/2012 03:59 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'm also not real keen on the idea that someone could dump a 9.2
database and be unable to load it into 9.3 because of the DDL trigger,
especially if they might not encounter it until halfway through a
restore. That seems rather user-hostile to me.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On 10/11/2012 03:59 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'm also not real keen on the idea that someone could dump a 9.2
database and be unable to load it into 9.3 because of the DDL trigger,
especially if they might not
On 10/11/2012 08:20 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On 10/11/2012 03:59 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'm also not real keen on the idea that someone could dump a 9.2
database and be unable to load it into 9.3 because of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tom and Simon wrote:
If you want to get rid of rules, build the
replacement; don't just try to be a pain in the ass to users.
Supporting broken and non-standard features *is* a pain in the ass to
users, since they are sometimes persuaded
FWIW I thought the stuff in commit 092d7ded2 might be pretty useful
generally.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
: [HACKERS] Deprecating RULES
On 10/11/2012 08:20 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Joshua D. Drake
j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
On 10/11/2012 03:59 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'm also not real keen on the idea that someone could dump a 9.2
database and be unable
Josh Berkus wrote:
For 9.3, I suggest we create a DDL trigger by default which prevents
RULEs and throws an ERROR that explains they are now deprecated.
Well, even if we were considering this, the sequence would need to be:
1. Announce in 9.3 that RULES will be going away RSN.
2. In 9.4, send
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo