--On Freitag, Februar 25, 2005 12:02:47 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list
about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication
of effort.
Jaime Casanova and me are still working on view update rules
Tom Lane wrote:
I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list
about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication
of effort.
Stuff I have done in some form that I need to finish up and submit:
- GiST improvements: sane memory management, 10% scan perf.
On Feb 25, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Matthew T. O'Connor" writes:
Are there any big projects are people
working on to get into 8.1?
I'm privately hoping to get bitmap index operations into 8.1 (that is,
build a bitmap of tuple locations from an index, possibly AND or OR the
results of mu
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce used to try to describe our releases as being oriented towards some
> particular goal, but I always thought that these were after-the-fact
> descriptions that had nothing to do with the real development process.
> The truth is that individual developers work on what they fee
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:49:59AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have no idea how to predict what will be in 8.1. I couldn't predict
> > what would be in 8.0 until just before feature freeze, so the idea that
> > we would have any clue about 8.1 is unrealistic.
> >
> > H
I wouldn't mind seeing people be a little more vocal on the hackers list
about what they plan to be doing, just so that there's not duplication
of effort. But trying to assemble that into some sort of published
Master Plan sounds to me like just a recipe for making ourselves look
foolish when the
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm happy with the Zen approach of "there is no answer, the code comes
> when it is time" and "HACKERS list IS the process".
> Many people take the lack of a planned release date as clear indication
> that there is no strictly controlled release process, h
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 16:49 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> I have no idea how to predict what will be in 8.1. I couldn't predict
> what would be in 8.0 until just before feature freeze, so the idea that
> we would have any clue about 8.1 is unrealistic.
A good guess for the features contained in
"Matthew T. O'Connor" writes:
> Are there any big projects are people
> working on to get into 8.1?
I'm privately hoping to get bitmap index operations into 8.1 (that is,
build a bitmap of tuple locations from an index, possibly AND or OR the
results of multiple indexes, and finally visit the he
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:49:59AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have no idea how to predict what will be in 8.1. I couldn't predict
> what would be in 8.0 until just before feature freeze, so the idea that
> we would have any clue about 8.1 is unrealistic.
>
> How do other open source projects
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have no idea how to predict what will be in 8.1. I couldn't predict
what would be in 8.0 until just before feature freeze, so the idea that
we would have any clue about 8.1 is unrealistic.
I agree there is no way to accurately predict such things, however there
was a lon
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm giving a talk next week on PostgreSQL 8, so I would like some input
> from the community on a few issues, so that my answers are as close to
> majority opinion as possible.
>
> One of the most frequent set of questions I get asked is around the
> development vision and rel
I'm giving a talk next week on PostgreSQL 8, so I would like some input
from the community on a few issues, so that my answers are as close to
majority opinion as possible.
One of the most frequent set of questions I get asked is around the
development vision and release strategy of PostgreSQL.
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
