While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to
past releases. For example,
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions A
magic block is required as of PostgreSQL 8.2. Sure, this is true even
as of 9.2 or even 9.3. There are a few more such references
Hi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.comwrote:
While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to
past releases. For example,
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions A
magic block is required as of PostgreSQL 8.2.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
The phrasing as of 8.2 basically means from 8.2 onwards. Changing the
version there would make the text incorrect.
Ah Ok. Thanks for clarifying. My bad English.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to
past releases. For example,
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions A
magic block is required as of PostgreSQL 8.2. Sure, this is true even
as of 9.2 or even 9.3. There are a
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Pavan Deolasee pavan.deola...@gmail.com
wrote:
While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to
past releases. For example,
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
The phrasing as of 8.2 basically means from 8.2 onwards. Changing the
version there would make the text incorrect.
In theory we could remove that reference completely since any
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
The phrasing as of 8.2 basically means from 8.2 onwards. Changing the
version there would make the text
