Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: references to old versions

2013-02-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page wrote: >>> The phrasing "as of 8.2" basically means "from 8.2 onwards". Changing the >>> version there would make the text incorrect. > >> In theory we could remove that refe

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: references to old versions

2013-02-12 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page wrote: >> The phrasing "as of 8.2" basically means "from 8.2 onwards". Changing the >> version there would make the text incorrect. > In theory we could remove that reference completely since any versions > where it does not a

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: references to old versions

2013-02-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page wrote: > > Hi > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Pavan Deolasee > wrote: >> >> While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to >> past releases. For example, >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions "A

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: references to old versions

2013-02-12 Thread Albe Laurenz
Pavan Deolasee wrote: > While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to > past releases. For example, > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions "A > magic block is required as of PostgreSQL 8.2". Sure, this is true even > as of 9.2 or even 9.3. There a

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: references to old versions

2013-02-12 Thread Pavan Deolasee
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Dave Page wrote: > > > The phrasing "as of 8.2" basically means "from 8.2 onwards". Changing the > version there would make the text incorrect. > Ah Ok. Thanks for clarifying. My bad English. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeola

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation: references to old versions

2013-02-12 Thread Dave Page
Hi On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Pavan Deolasee wrote: > While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to > past releases. For example, > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions "A > magic block is required as of PostgreSQL 8.2". Sure, this is true

[HACKERS] Documentation: references to old versions

2013-02-12 Thread Pavan Deolasee
While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to past releases. For example, http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions "A magic block is required as of PostgreSQL 8.2". Sure, this is true even as of 9.2 or even 9.3. There are a few more such references th