On 2015-01-13 20:21:55 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-01-13 11:10:06 -0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > EXEC_BACKEND on Windows doesn't actually use a tempfile though, so I'm
> > guessing that's it.
>
> Ah! Then this really is fairly harmless. Will fix and backpatch anyway,
> but the number
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2015-01-13 11:10:06 -0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> EXEC_BACKEND on Windows doesn't actually use a tempfile though, so I'm
>> guessing that's it.
> Ah! Then this really is fairly harmless. Will fix and backpatch anyway,
> but the number of affected people should be pre
On 2015-01-13 11:10:06 -0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> EXEC_BACKEND on Windows doesn't actually use a tempfile though, so I'm
> guessing that's it.
Ah! Then this really is fairly harmless. Will fix and backpatch anyway,
but the number of affected people should be pretty much zero.
Greetings,
And
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Andres Freund
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the combination from $subject fails for me with "could not
> read from backend variables file ...".
>
> The origin for that problem seems to be b94ce6e80 which moved
> RemovePgTempFiles() to after SysLogger_Start(). Unless
Hi,
Currently the combination from $subject fails for me with "could not
read from backend variables file ...".
The origin for that problem seems to be b94ce6e80 which moved
RemovePgTempFiles() to after SysLogger_Start(). Unless the syslogger
starts up very quickly RemovePgTempFiles() will have d
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:35 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > > > I can't find anything coherent in docs/readme/comments to explain why it
> > > > exists and what its implications are.
> > >
> > > It exists because Windows doesn't have fork(), only the equivalent of
> > >
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We keep talking about EXEC_BACKEND mode, though until recently I had
> misunderstood what that meant. I also realise
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We keep talking about EXEC_BACKEND mode, though until recently I had
misunderstood what that meant. I also realised that I have more than
once n
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > We keep talking about EXEC_BACKEND mode, though until recently I had
> > > misunderstood what that meant. I also realised that I have more than
> > > once neglected to take i
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We keep talking about EXEC_BACKEND mode, though until recently I had
> > misunderstood what that meant. I also realised that I have more than
> > once neglected to take it into account when writing a p
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We keep talking about EXEC_BACKEND mode, though until recently I had
> misunderstood what that meant. I also realised that I have more than
> once neglected to take it into account when writing a patch - one recent
> patch failed to do this.
> I can't find
We keep talking about EXEC_BACKEND mode, though until recently I had
misunderstood what that meant. I also realised that I have more than
once neglected to take it into account when writing a patch - one recent
patch failed to do this.
I can't find anything coherent in docs/readme/comments to exp
12 matches
Mail list logo
