"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> none of the other half are printing messages that are more useful
>> than "out of shared memory" (which isn't even necessarily
>> correct).
> I think the messages in the locking area are a bit more useful than
> "out of shared memory", but it would
Tom Lane wrote:
> none of the other half are printing messages that are more useful
> than "out of shared memory" (which isn't even necessarily
> correct).
I think the messages in the locking area are a bit more useful than
"out of shared memory", but it would be trivial to build the
equivalen
Tom Lane wrote:
> The functions ShmemInitStruct and ShmemInitHash will return NULL on
> certain failure conditions, apparently on the grounds that their caller
> can print a more useful error message than they can. A quick survey
> shows that about half the callers aren't remembering to check for
The functions ShmemInitStruct and ShmemInitHash will return NULL on
certain failure conditions, apparently on the grounds that their caller
can print a more useful error message than they can. A quick survey
shows that about half the callers aren't remembering to check for NULL,
and none of the ot
