Re: [HACKERS] FRONTEND in ecpg

2004-04-13 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Or should FRONTEND perhaps even be explicitly #defined in postgres_fe.h? > You know, that is an excellent idea. I have been adding FRONTEND to > specific Makefiles just in cases where I need special src/port compiles > of files, but putting it in postgr

Re: [HACKERS] FRONTEND in ecpg

2004-04-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any reason why FRONTEND is not specified in the ecpg build > (specifically the pgtypeslib)? I'm running into build problems because > it pulls backend-specific stuff from port.h in > (postgres_fe.h->c.h->port.h) when tweaking the timezone code. > > Or sho

Re: [HACKERS] FRONTEND in ecpg

2004-04-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any reason why FRONTEND is not specified in the ecpg build > (specifically the pgtypeslib)? I'm running into build problems because > it pulls backend-specific stuff from port.h in > (postgres_fe.h->c.h->port.h) when tweaking the timezone code. > > Or sho

[HACKERS] FRONTEND in ecpg

2004-04-13 Thread Magnus Hagander
Hi! Is there any reason why FRONTEND is not specified in the ecpg build (specifically the pgtypeslib)? I'm running into build problems because it pulls backend-specific stuff from port.h in (postgres_fe.h->c.h->port.h) when tweaking the timezone code. Or should FRONTEND perhaps even be explicitly