On 10/06/2014 10:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I think it might be desirable but it'd be a mess, both as to the
concept/definition and as to the implementation.
Thanks Tom.
The issues around ALTER etc pretty much put it in the
not-worth-caring-about bucket. The issues around parameter typing alone...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tom Lane said:
...
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
While looking at an unrelated issue in PgJDBC I noticed that it's
difficult for users and the driver to tell in advance if a given
statement will support bind parameters.
It's
Hi all
While looking at an unrelated issue in PgJDBC I noticed that it's
difficult for users and the driver to tell in advance if a given
statement will support bind parameters.
PostgreSQL just treats placeholders as syntax errors for non-plannable
statements at parse time.
This forces users to
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
While looking at an unrelated issue in PgJDBC I noticed that it's
difficult for users and the driver to tell in advance if a given
statement will support bind parameters.
It's not that hard ;-) ... if it ain't SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE,
it won't
