Re: [HACKERS] Feature suggestion: Postgresql binding to one IP?

Hi Lincoln, Not sure why you would want to run multiple instances, since you can run multiple dbs if you want to maintain separate environments but if you really need to do this, the postmaster has some options which control ip/port binds: [pritchma@blade pritchma]$

Re: [HACKERS] Feature suggestion: Postgresql binding to one

At 11:16 PM 03-10-2001 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Lincoln Yeoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it possible for Postgresql to bind to one IP address? See 'virtual_host' GUC parameter. regards, tom lane Thanks! I'm using a redhat style postgresql init and somehow postgresql

Re: [HACKERS] Feature suggestion: Postgresql binding to one

Lincoln Yeoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm using a redhat style postgresql init and somehow postgresql seems to ignore the postgresql.conf file. That seems unlikely, assuming you are running a PG version recent enough to have a postgresql.conf file (ie 7.1 or better). What exactly are you

[HACKERS] Feature suggestion: Postgresql binding to one IP?

Hi people, Is it possible for Postgresql to bind to one IP address? I'm trying to run multiple postgresql installations on one server. The unix socket could be named accordingly: Postgresql config bound to a particular port and all IPs. .s.PGSQL.portnumber Postgresql config bound to a

Re: [HACKERS] Feature suggestion: Postgresql binding to one IP?

Lincoln Yeoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it possible for Postgresql to bind to one IP address? See 'virtual_host' GUC parameter. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster