On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I was just annoyed to find out that a foreign key doesn't check whether
> the referenced column has a sufficiently similar data type, it only checks
> whether an = operator exists. This masks schema design errors and typos.
> Should this be tightened
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> >I was just annoyed to find out that a foreign key doesn't check whether
> >the referenced column has a sufficiently similar data type, it only checks
> >whether an = operator exists. This masks schema design errors and typos.
> >Should this be t
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I was just annoyed to find out that a foreign key doesn't check whether
the referenced column has a sufficiently similar data type, it only checks
whether an = operator exists. This masks schema design errors and typos.
Should this be tightened up, for example using the ca
I was just annoyed to find out that a foreign key doesn't check whether
the referenced column has a sufficiently similar data type, it only checks
whether an = operator exists. This masks schema design errors and typos.
Should this be tightened up, for example using the castability
characteristics
