Re: [HACKERS] Foreign servers and user mappings versus the extensions patch

2011-02-07 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Currently, the extensions patch considers that foreign data wrappers, foreign servers, and user mapping objects can all be parts of extensions. This is slightly problematic for pg_dump,

[HACKERS] Foreign servers and user mappings versus the extensions patch

2011-02-05 Thread Tom Lane
Currently, the extensions patch considers that foreign data wrappers, foreign servers, and user mapping objects can all be parts of extensions. This is slightly problematic for pg_dump, where somebody decided to take a shortcut and not implement user mappings using the full DumpableObject

Re: [HACKERS] Foreign servers and user mappings versus the extensions patch

2011-02-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Currently, the extensions patch considers that foreign data wrappers, foreign servers, and user mapping objects can all be parts of extensions. This is slightly problematic for pg_dump, where somebody decided to take a shortcut