[HACKERS] Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is)

2006-06-27 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is updated for every command, default to on. It strikes me that the ps_status support provides one important bit of information that is currently hard to get elsewhere; specifically, the

Re: [HACKERS] Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is)

2006-06-27 Thread Stephen Frost
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is updated for every command, default to on. It strikes me that the ps_status support provides one important bit of information that is currently

Re: [HACKERS] Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is)

2006-06-27 Thread Stephen Frost
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: That would be an *excellent* addition.. Honestly, I think it'd be nice to get a 'NOTICE' in such cases too, but having it in pg_stat_activity will help alot. Additionally, Tom, and I hate to point this out here but I don't see much of an alternative;