On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
forward patch to pg_hackers
There is fixed patch. Please, Jaime, can you look on it?
this one passed regression tests and my personal test script (of
course it passed the script the last time too)... i'm doing a lot
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
There is fixed patch. Please, Jaime, can you look on it?
Applied with significant revisions. I really wanted this code factored
out, because we'd otherwise end up duplicating it in other PLs (and it
was already duplicative of execQual.c). So I
2009/8/6 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
There is fixed patch. Please, Jaime, can you look on it?
Applied with significant revisions. I really wanted this code factored
out, because we'd otherwise end up duplicating it in other PLs (and it
was
forward patch to pg_hackers
There is fixed patch. Please, Jaime, can you look on it?
Thank You
Pavel
2009/7/30 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Jaime Casanova jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec writes:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Alvaro
Getting rid of the check on natts was ungood ... it needs
