Re: [HACKERS] HEAD is open for 8.5 development

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thursday 02 July 2009 05:29:58 Robert Haas wrote: If you are taking a look at any of the patches submitted for this CommitFest, please put your name next to them on the wiki. Please ALSO add a comment saying something like tgl says: I am reviewing this, no need to assign a round-robin

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD is open for 8.5 development

2009-07-02 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Peter Eisentrautpete...@gmx.net wrote: On Thursday 02 July 2009 05:29:58 Robert Haas wrote: If you are taking a look at any of the patches submitted for this CommitFest, please put your name next to them on the wiki.  Please ALSO add a comment saying something

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD is open for 8.5 development

2009-07-02 Thread Greg Smith
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Robert Haas wrote: I think it's important to clarify the distinction between when a committer is planning to look at the patch but maybe somebody else should too, and when the committer is planning to take exclusive responsibility for the patch and nobody else should

[HACKERS] HEAD is open for 8.5 development

2009-07-01 Thread Tom Lane
Let the breakage begin ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] HEAD is open for 8.5 development

2009-07-01 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Let the breakage begin ...                        regards, tom lane Tom - and all other committers - In order to avoid duplication of effort, we should avoid assigning round-robin reviewers to any patches which the committers