Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-03 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes, I haven't gotten to the release checklist yet. Let's delay a day. > > Or at least late in the day tomorrow. I have some loose ends to clean > up yet as well, but I'm beat and am going to bed. > > But I assu

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-03 Thread Marc G. Fournier
S'alright, I can do the package together tomorrow morning to let you wrap up the loose ends :) On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I am still working on the 7.3 HISTORY file. I have extracted the items, > but I have to worksmith them and write an introduction. > > It is midnight here no

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, I haven't gotten to the release checklist yet. Let's delay a day. Or at least late in the day tomorrow. I have some loose ends to clean up yet as well, but I'm beat and am going to bed. But I assume we are now officially in feature freeze, right

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't know of any other items holding up the packaging. > > Gotta brand the thing as 7.3beta1 not 7.3devel, no? Yes, I haven't gotten to the release checklist yet. Let's delay a day. I have a 17k line log file down to 3.5k lines

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know of any other items holding up the packaging. Gotta brand the thing as 7.3beta1 not 7.3devel, no? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked ou

[HACKERS] HISTORY file

2002-09-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
I am still working on the 7.3 HISTORY file. I have extracted the items, but I have to worksmith them and write an introduction. It is midnight here now. I don't think I can finish before ~3am and at that point, I am not sure I will know what I am writing. Basically, one day of feature freeze w

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2001-10-27 Thread Stephan Szabo
> | Fix for inherited CHECK constraints (Stephan Szabo) > > ditto If this is what I think it is, I think the actual fix was the following (although I don't know what a particularly good wording is) ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT now properly adds check constraints to children of the specified tab

[HACKERS] HISTORY file

2001-10-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I find the HISTORY file to be distressingly poor to peruse. Reasons: A large proportion of the items don't convey any useful information. Examples: | PLpgSQL fix for SELECT... FOR UPDATE (Tom) What did this fix? Does SELECT FOR UDPATE now work whereas it didn't use to? => "SELECT ... FOR UPDA

Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY file

2001-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
> > May be it's cosmetic, but: > > - "Migration to 7.1" right is "Migration to 7.2" Fixed. > > Be missing: > > - information that some parts of interface are translated to >Swedish, Russian, French, Germany nad Czech. > (IMHO right place for information about Peter's NLS suppo

[HACKERS] HISTORY file

2001-10-01 Thread Karel Zak
May be it's cosmetic, but: - "Migration to 7.1" right is "Migration to 7.2" Be missing: - information that some parts of interface are translated to Swedish, Russian, French, Germany nad Czech. (IMHO right place for information about Peter's NLS support is "Major changes in th