Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did we ever do anything about this?
Seems to be in there in CVS HEAD:
/*
* If we just insert the tuples into the index in scan order, then
* (assuming their hash codes are pretty random) there will be no locality
* of access to the in
Did we ever do anything about this?
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> I've been reviewing the hash index build patch submitted here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-10/msg00154.php
>
> Although it definitely helps o
I've been reviewing the hash index build patch submitted here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-10/msg00154.php
Although it definitely helps on large indexes, it's actually
counterproductive on not-so-large ones. The test case I'm using
is random integers generated like this:
