Re: [HACKERS] Help required to debug pg_repack breaking logical replication

2017-10-12 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > (with a > custom addition to update the relfrozenxid which seems backwards to me > as it sets the older frozen xid on the new table [3]). > > [3] https://github.com/reorg/pg_repack/issues/152 Wow. That's

Re: [HACKERS] Help required to debug pg_repack breaking logical replication

2017-10-10 Thread Petr Jelinek
On 08/10/17 15:21, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 8 October 2017 at 02:37, Daniele Varrazzo > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> we have been reported, and I have experienced a couple of times, >> pg_repack breaking logical replication. >> >> -

Re: [HACKERS] Help required to debug pg_repack breaking logical replication

2017-10-08 Thread Craig Ringer
On 8 October 2017 at 02:37, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > Hello, > > we have been reported, and I have experienced a couple of times, > pg_repack breaking logical replication. > > - https://github.com/reorg/pg_repack/issues/135 > -

[HACKERS] Help required to debug pg_repack breaking logical replication

2017-10-07 Thread Daniele Varrazzo
Hello, we have been reported, and I have experienced a couple of times, pg_repack breaking logical replication. - https://github.com/reorg/pg_repack/issues/135 - https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pglogical/issues/113 In my experience, after the botched run, the replication slot was "stuck", and