Thomas Lockhart writes:
> 31) Specifications for Feature F511, "BIT data type":
> a) Subclause 5.3, "":
>i) Without Feature F511, "BIT data type", a
> shall not be a or a literal>.
>
> This seems to be a hard linkage of hex strings with the BIT type.
You'll also find in 5.3 Con
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> I've got patches to adjust the interpretation of hex literals from an
> integer type (which is how I implemented it years ago to support the
> *syntax*) to a bit string type. I've mentioned this in a previous
> thread, and am following up now.
>
> One point raised previou
Oh, I've also implemented int8 to/from bit conversions, which was a
trivial addition/modification to the int4 support already there...
- Thomas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister
I've got patches to adjust the interpretation of hex literals from an
integer type (which is how I implemented it years ago to support the
*syntax*) to a bit string type. I've mentioned this in a previous
thread, and am following up now.
One point raised previously is that the spec may not be cle
