Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby v5 patch assertion failure

2008-11-09 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Simon Riggs wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 12:16 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: Trying out a few different scenarios I ran across this: 1/ Setup master and replica with replica using pg_standby 2/ Create a new database (bench in my case) 3/ Initialize pgbench schema size 100 4/ Run with 2

Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby v5 patch assertion failure

2008-11-03 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 06:41 +, Simon Riggs wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 12:16 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: Trying out a few different scenarios I ran across this: CONTEXT: xlog redo update: rel 1663/16384/16397; tid 9614/62; new 158828/59 DEBUG: start recovery xid = 7002 lsn =

[HACKERS] Hot standby v5 patch assertion failure

2008-11-02 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Trying out a few different scenarios I ran across this: 1/ Setup master and replica with replica using pg_standby 2/ Create a new database (bench in my case) 3/ Initialize pgbench schema size 100 4/ Run with 2 clients and 1 transactions 5/ Replica gets assertion failure This is Postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Hot standby v5 patch assertion failure

2008-11-02 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 12:16 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: Trying out a few different scenarios I ran across this: CONTEXT: xlog redo update: rel 1663/16384/16397; tid 9614/62; new 158828/59 DEBUG: start recovery xid = 7002 lsn = 0/6F012EE4 CONTEXT: xlog redo update: rel 1663/16384/16397;