On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:22 AM chinnaobi wrote:
Hey Haas,
What does the standby server have to wait for replication to catch up
before
promoting ?? Is there any parameter to configure this ??
Few more questions on this part
1. How could we ensure the standby has received all
Hey Amitkapila,
Thank you for the quick reply.
How can implement this patch in windows, because I am using windows 9.1.1
postgreSQL application ??
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-base-backup-in-automated-failover-tp5711147p5728562.html
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:09 PM chinnaobi wrote:
Hey Amitkapila,
Thank you for the quick reply.
How can implement this patch in windows, because I am using windows
9.1.1
postgreSQL application ??
If the patch serves the feature you require, then once it gets committed
(there are
Hey Haas,What does the standby server have to wait for replication to catch
up before promoting ?? Is there any parameter to configure this ??Few more
questions on this part 1. How could we ensure the standby has received all
transactions sent by primary till the point primary server is dead.
Hey Haas,
What does the standby server have to wait for replication to catch up before
promoting ?? Is there any parameter to configure this ??
Few more questions on this part
1. How could we ensure the standby has received all transactions sent by
primary till the point primary server is
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:14 AM, chinnaobi chinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently I was writing an application to implement automated failover with
env: Two 2008 R2 servers, Network area storage, asynchronous replication,
WAL archive on primary enabled.
Is there any way to avoid starting standby
Hi all,
Recently I was writing an application to implement automated failover with
env: Two 2008 R2 servers, Network area storage, asynchronous replication,
WAL archive on primary enabled.
Is there any way to avoid starting standby server always from base backup in
automated failover. I see the
