Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-11-15 00:11:36 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
>> After reading up through archives on the two $subj related TODO items
>> I'm under impression that the patches[1,2] didn't make it mainly because
>> of the risk of breaking SSL internals if we try to longjump out of the
Andres Freund writes:
>
> On 2014-11-15 00:11:36 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
>> After reading up through archives on the two $subj related TODO items
>> I'm under impression that the patches[1,2] didn't make it mainly because
>> of the risk of breaking SSL internals if we try to longjump out of t
Hi,
On 2014-11-15 00:11:36 +0300, Alex Shulgin wrote:
> After reading up through archives on the two $subj related TODO items
> I'm under impression that the patches[1,2] didn't make it mainly because
> of the risk of breaking SSL internals if we try to longjump out of the
> signal handler in the
Hello Hackers,
After reading up through archives on the two $subj related TODO items
I'm under impression that the patches[1,2] didn't make it mainly because
of the risk of breaking SSL internals if we try to longjump out of the
signal handler in the middle of a blocking SSL read and/or if we try
