Re: [HACKERS] Improving PL/PgSQL (was: Re: plpgsql defensive mode)

2014-09-06 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-09-06 21:47 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule : > > > > 2014-09-06 20:08 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja : > >> On 2014-09-06 7:56 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >>> 2014-09-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja : >>> Then that doesn't really solve our problem. Switching between two languages on a per-fun

Re: [HACKERS] Improving PL/PgSQL (was: Re: plpgsql defensive mode)

2014-09-06 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-09-06 20:08 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja : > On 2014-09-06 7:56 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> 2014-09-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja : >> >>> Then that doesn't really solve our problem. Switching between two >>> languages on a per-function basis, when both look exactly the same but >>> have >

[HACKERS] Improving PL/PgSQL (was: Re: plpgsql defensive mode)

2014-09-06 Thread Marko Tiikkaja
On 2014-09-06 7:56 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: 2014-09-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja : Then that doesn't really solve our problem. Switching between two languages on a per-function basis, when both look exactly the same but have very different semantics would be a nightmare. It is maximum w