On 2016-04-01 20:18:29 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On 1 April 2016 at 17:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Rowley writes:
> >> The attached fixes an error message which is incorrectly using an
> >> unsigned format specifier instead of a signed one.
> >
> > Really though, what
> > astonishes me about
On 1 April 2016 at 17:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Rowley writes:
>> The attached fixes an error message which is incorrectly using an
>> unsigned format specifier instead of a signed one.
>
> Really though, what
> astonishes me about this example is that we allow indexes at all on
> system column
On 1 April 2016 at 17:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Rowley writes:
>> The attached fixes an error message which is incorrectly using an
>> unsigned format specifier instead of a signed one.
>
> I think that's the tip of the iceberg :-(. For starters, the code
> allows ObjectIdAttributeNumber witho
David Rowley writes:
> The attached fixes an error message which is incorrectly using an
> unsigned format specifier instead of a signed one.
I think that's the tip of the iceberg :-(. For starters, the code
allows ObjectIdAttributeNumber without regard for the fact that the
next line will dump
The attached fixes an error message which is incorrectly using an
unsigned format specifier instead of a signed one.
# create table t ();
# create unique index t_idx on t (ctid);
# alter table t replica identity using index t_idx;
ERROR: internal column 4294967295 in unique index "t_idx"
I was j
