Re: [HACKERS] Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata

2007-11-04 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:28:46 +0100 Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > > x86_64 is x86_64, regardless of intel or amd. > > Not exactly, ask kernel guys ;-). But for user space yes. For the context of the discu

Re: [HACKERS] Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata

2007-11-04 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Joshua D. Drake wrote: x86_64 is x86_64, regardless of intel or amd. Not exactly, ask kernel guys ;-). But for user space yes. Zdenek ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www

Re: [HACKERS] Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata

2007-11-02 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:40:46 -0400 Jeff Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > Asking here since it may deal with clever things such as alignment > and or binary reps. > > I'm migrating from some opterons to some xeons (E5345) both are

Re: [HACKERS] Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata

2007-11-02 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm migrating from some opterons to some xeons (E5345) both are > running x86_64. At first I figured I'd need to dump & load my data, > which will be painful. But on a whim I made a test db on the > opteron, copied it over (tar) and it fired up and wo

[HACKERS] Intel x64 vs AMD x64 pgdata

2007-11-02 Thread Jeff Trout
Hey folks, Asking here since it may deal with clever things such as alignment and or binary reps. I'm migrating from some opterons to some xeons (E5345) both are running x86_64. At first I figured I'd need to dump & load my data, which will be painful. But on a whim I made a test db on t