Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 18:51 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > >> It strikes me that a
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 18:51 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > >> It strikes me that allowing archive_command to be c
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 22:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I _still_ have no patch for this.
>
> Bruce,
>
> As I've mentioned, there is another thread where the discussion
> continued, which you should refer to.
>
> The subject of this thread is a potential bug that has
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 22:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I _still_ have no patch for this.
Bruce,
As I've mentioned, there is another thread where the discussion
continued, which you should refer to.
The subject of this thread is a potential bug that has existed since 8.1
and that I recently p
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 19:09 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Where is this patch?
see Hackers thread: "Minor changes to Recovery related code", Mar 30
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---(end of broadcast)-
