Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is your current value one less than a multiple of 16, by any chance?
> Currently 32. It is unclear whether you think 31 is the failure case your
> thinking of or whether 31 might help.
No, 32 is actually the best c
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> The comment in ProcGetNewSemIdAndNum suggests that you might be able to
> suppress the problem in 7.2 by using a different max_connections value.
> Is your current value one less than a multiple of 16, by any chance?
>
Currently 32. It is unclear whether
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have an underpowered server running 7.2.6 that backs a website which
> occasionally gets hit by a bunch of traffic and starts firing off "FATAL
> 1: Sorry, too many clients already" messages. This is all as expected,
> but sometimes it just crashes. I h
I have an underpowered server running 7.2.6 that backs a website which
occasionally gets hit by a bunch of traffic and starts firing off "FATAL
1: Sorry, too many clients already" messages. This is all as expected,
but sometimes it just crashes. I had no clue what was going on until I
checked t
