Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter

2002-06-18 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> _deadcode is nowadays known as CVS history. > > > Agreed, but _deadcode directories still exist, so I put it there. > > Personally, I would like to see all those files removed, but I was > > outvoted las

Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter

2002-06-18 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> _deadcode is nowadays known as CVS history. > Agreed, but _deadcode directories still exist, so I put it there. > Personally, I would like to see all those files removed, but I was > outvoted last time I asked. Perhaps we ne

Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] KSQO parameter

2002-06-16 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 16 June 2002 01:09 > To: Tom Lane > Cc: PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL odbc list > Subject: Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] KSQO parameter > > > either ... does anyone out there w

Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter

2002-06-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there any value to KQSO parameter? It was for complex OR clauses. I > > thought Tom fixed most of that. > > The last set of tests that I did (~7.0) showed that it was still > marginally faster than the default approach. Not a "