Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-31 Thread Steve Howe
]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 8:57 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries > Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well haven't this problem solved already ? > > I'm not sure. Steve, have you tried curr

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well haven't this problem solved already ? I'm not sure. Steve, have you tried current sources? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe comman

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-29 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Tom Lane wrote: > > Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes it's real. > > Error handling seems the cause. > > Hmm, are you working with CVS tip or 7.1.* sources? I'm wondering > how this interacts with the recent patch to #define errno as > WSAGetLastError() on WIN32... > Oops sorry

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes it's real. > Error handling seems the cause. Hmm, are you working with CVS tip or 7.1.* sources? I'm wondering how this interacts with the recent patch to #define errno as WSAGetLastError() on WIN32... regards, tom lane --

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-27 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Tom Lane wrote: > > "Steve Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit from libpq > > windows port ??? > > FWIW, if the problem is real (which I still misdoubt), Yes it's real. Error handling seems the cause. When "Error: pqReadData() -- r

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-27 Thread Joerg Hessdoerfer
At 01:36 27.07.2001 -0400, you wrote: >"Steve Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit from libpq > > windows port ??? > >I think it's *your* responsibility, at least to identify what's going >on. This is an open source project, and that

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Steve Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit from libpq > windows port ??? I think it's *your* responsibility, at least to identify what's going on. This is an open source project, and that means you can and should fix problems that aff

RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-26 Thread Khoa Do
eleves and post some patch to it. -Original Message- From: Steve Howe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries Hello all, Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit

[HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-25 Thread Steve Howe
Hello all, Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit from libpq windows port ??? We've discussed this topic on "Large queries - again" thread and it seems like nobody got interested on fixing it. All Windows applications that rely on libpq are broken because of