Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But the change highlights one point: the order in which file blocks are
> written to disk is undefined. Theoretically the wal checkpoint record
> could be on the platter, but the preceeding pages were not written.
> Is that case handled by the wal repl
Gregory Stark wrote:
This patch also looks relevant to Postgres for two reasons.
This part seems like it might expose some bugs that otherwise might have
remained hidden:
This affects I/O scheduling potentially quite significantly. It is no
longer the case that the kernel wi
This patch also looks relevant to Postgres for two reasons.
This part seems like it might expose some bugs that otherwise might have
remained hidden:
This affects I/O scheduling potentially quite significantly. It is no
longer the case that the kernel will submit pages for
