Re: [HACKERS] Logging auto_explain outputs to another log file

2008-11-26 Thread Robert Treat
On Sunday 23 November 2008 15:50:09 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Is $SUBJECT possible? If not, do you think it would be worth > >> implementing this? > > > > No, and no. The feature isn't even in core; it can hardly

Re: [HACKERS] Logging auto_explain outputs to another log file

2008-11-23 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Is $SUBJECT possible? If not, do you think it would be worth implementing this? No, and no. The feature isn't even in core; it can hardly qualify as something that should drive a massive overhaul of the e

Re: [HACKERS] Logging auto_explain outputs to another log file

2008-11-23 Thread Tom Lane
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is $SUBJECT possible? If not, do you think it would be worth > implementing this? No, and no. The feature isn't even in core; it can hardly qualify as something that should drive a massive overhaul of the elog infrastructure. Which

[HACKERS] Logging auto_explain outputs to another log file

2008-11-23 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, Is $SUBJECT possible? If not, do you think it would be worth implementing this? If this parameter is not used appropriately, it may fill up logs -- that's why I am asking this question. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr