Re: [HACKERS] Loss of some parts of the function definition

2015-05-04 Thread Sergey Grinko
About view. I found where I saw it was a discussion solve some problems with view https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Views_and_Rules, ie it is in the list of TODO, so there is a chance that it will be implemented. 03 Май 2015 г. 12:15 пользователь Sergey Grinko sergey.gri...@gmail.com написал:

Re: [HACKERS] Loss of some parts of the function definition

2015-05-03 Thread Sergey Grinko
Thank you Jim! Views, they also have the problem. In my practice I use them very little, so do not just remember them. Somewhere I read that already are going to introduce their storage source. If I find this source, then I write the link here. I am a supporter of conservation of the source code.

Re: [HACKERS] Loss of some parts of the function definition

2015-05-01 Thread Jim Nasby
On 4/30/15 6:44 AM, Sergey Grinko wrote: Now create a script in the application of its function parameters and return values can be declared using %TYPE. However, when you save the script is stored inside the server only what is considered his body. Thus, we obtain: ... We actually mung things

[HACKERS] Loss of some parts of the function definition

2015-04-30 Thread Sergey Grinko
Hi, Dear developers, I have a request to you. Now create a script in the application of its function parameters and return values can be declared using %TYPE. However, when you save the script is stored inside the server only what is considered his body. Thus, we obtain: 1) loss of the custom

Re: [HACKERS] Loss of some parts of the function definition

2015-04-30 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hi 2015-04-30 13:44 GMT+02:00 Sergey Grinko sergey.gri...@gmail.com: Hi, Dear developers, I have a request to you. Now create a script in the application of its function parameters and return values can be declared using %TYPE. However, when you save the script is stored inside the server

Re: [HACKERS] Loss of some parts of the function definition

2015-04-30 Thread Sergey Grinko
I agree that it is better to show what really works. I propose to allow additional option through a source code which is made on the basis of a compilation of metadata. This will solve the problem. 2015-04-30 16:19 GMT+03:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com: 2015-04-30 15:08 GMT+02:00

Re: [HACKERS] Loss of some parts of the function definition

2015-04-30 Thread Pavel Stehule
2015-04-30 15:34 GMT+02:00 Sergey Grinko sergey.gri...@gmail.com: I agree that it is better to show what really works. I propose to allow additional option through a source code which is made on the basis of a compilation of metadata. This will solve the problem. You can to teach PostgreSQL