Fredrik Olsson wrote:
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Fredrik Olsson wrote:
snip
I guess I am not the only one moving from MS SQL Server, so is there
interest for others to use my work, as a contrib perhaps. And how
should I continue from here in that case?
I'd start a new
Am Mittwoch, 23. November 2005 16:32 schrieb Pollard, Mike:
If this gets added as a contrib, here's a version of uniqueidentifier
and newid() I wrote that maintains the same format as the SQL Server
version:
CREATE SCHEMA sqlserver
AUTHORIZATION postgres;
GRANT ALL ON SCHEMA sqlserver TO
Why do you use GRANT ALL and not GRANT SELECT, UPDATE? All means everybody
can do bad things with those sequences.
GRANT ALL on a sequence IS GRANT SELECT UPDATE.
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will
, Mike; Bill Bartlett; Fredrik
Olsson
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MS SQL Server compatibility functions
Why do you use GRANT ALL and not GRANT SELECT, UPDATE? All means
everybody
can do bad things with those sequences.
GRANT ALL on a sequence IS GRANT SELECT UPDATE.
Chris
Hi.
In the course of porting a database from Microsoft SQL Server to
PostgreSQL I have rewritten a few of the date and string functions in
pl/pgSQL. Started with just datepart, datediff and soundex, but once
started I continued and rewrote all date/time and string functions
supported by MS
I'd be _very_ interested. I'll also volunteer to help out on this if
you need assistance -- we have somewhat of a mixed environment here, so
I already have a few (simple) functions that allow some compatibility
between MS SQL Server and PostgreSQL (supporting nextval on SQL
Server, etc.), but it
Lincoln
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Bartlett
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:01 AM
To: 'Fredrik Olsson'; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MS SQL Server compatibility functions
I'd be _very_ interested. I'll
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Fredrik Olsson wrote:
snip
I guess I am not the only one moving from MS SQL Server, so is there interest
for others to use my work, as a contrib perhaps. And how should I continue
from here in that case?
I'd start a new project at pgfoundry and then would begin
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Fredrik Olsson wrote:
snip
I guess I am not the only one moving from MS SQL Server, so is there
interest for others to use my work, as a contrib perhaps. And how
should I continue from here in that case?
I'd start a new project at pgfoundry
I just started a MySQL compatibility functions project on pgfoundry.org.
I suggest starting an MSSQL one as well. I'd be interested if you
could mail me your code for your functions so far because many of the
MySQL functions are copied from MSSQL...
Chris
Fredrik Olsson wrote:
Hi.
In the
Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fredrik Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MS SQL Server compatibility functions
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:24:06 +0800
I just started a MySQL compatibility functions project on pgfoundry.org. I
suggest starting
11 matches
Mail list logo
