Looks good to me but I will get some other eyse on it before I apply it.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks good to me but I will get some other eyse on it before I apply it.
It's in already ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
Already applied. Thanks.
---
Gavin Sherry wrote:
The attached patch changes the existing behaviour of length(char(n)).
Currently, this is what happens:
template1=# select length('blah'::char(10));
length
Gavin Sherry wrote:
I believe Tom applied this while you were away.
Oh, sorry, I see it now:
test= select length('blah'::char(10));
length
4
(1 row)
I did test this before placing it the queue, but I now realize I have
been testing
I believe Tom applied this while you were away.
Gavin
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Looks good to me but I will get some other eyse on it before I apply it.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
The attached patch changes the existing behaviour of length(char(n)).
Currently, this is what happens:
template1=# select length('blah'::char(10));
length
10
(1 row)
With this patch:
template1=# select length('blah'::char(10));
length
4
(1 row)
This behaviour was
