On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan suggested [1] moving rbtree.c to src/backend/lib, which I
> think makes a lot of sense. Now that we have several other general purpose
> data structures in src/backend/lib (linked lists, a binary heap, and a
> pairing hea
On 12/22/2014 05:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
However, wasn't there some speculation about removing rbtree entirely?
Not that I recall. It's still used for GIN bulk loading. There might be
better ways to do that, but there hasn't been any serious discussion on
that.
There was some discussion on r
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> Peter Geoghegan suggested [1] moving rbtree.c to src/backend/lib, which
> I think makes a lot of sense. Now that we have several other general
> purpose data structures in src/backend/lib (linked lists, a binary heap,
> and a pairing heap), rbtree.c would definitely
Peter Geoghegan suggested [1] moving rbtree.c to src/backend/lib, which
I think makes a lot of sense. Now that we have several other general
purpose data structures in src/backend/lib (linked lists, a binary heap,
and a pairing heap), rbtree.c would definitely be better placed in
src/backend/li
