Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak...

2001-05-24 Thread The Hermit Hacker
Sorry for delay ... just built using the .tar.gz file as below if someone wants to check it to confirm ... for those with shell access on the server, just ftp to it and login as yourself, and cd to ~pgsql/ftp/pub/source/v7.1.2 ... if all looks well, I'll put out a more general announce later thi

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak ...

2001-05-23 Thread Tom Lane
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > which ones should I pull in? the ones in ~/ftp/pub/doc/7.1? or is there > newer along that tree that we need to generate? I think there are some doc fixes in the REL7_1 branch, so generating from the end of that branch would be nicest. Real quest

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak...

2001-05-23 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 23 May 2001, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > all mirrors use rsync to update their code, and all of those that are > listed at www.postgresql.org, both ftp and www, are no more then 2 days > old (Vince, it is two days we set it at, right?) ... Yup. > > > On Wed, 23 May 2001, bpalmer wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak ...

2001-05-23 Thread Tom Lane
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.1.2 ... > Just want a second opinion before I announce more publicly ... Looks OK from here except for the problem Peter already noted: the tarred-up doc files were created from development tip, not 7.1 branch.

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak...

2001-05-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
all mirrors use rsync to update their code, and all of those that are listed at www.postgresql.org, both ftp and www, are no more then 2 days old (Vince, it is two days we set it at, right?) ... On Wed, 23 May 2001, bpalmer wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > every time I've tr

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak...

2001-05-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
which ones should I pull in? the ones in ~/ftp/pub/doc/7.1? or is there newer along that tree that we need to generate? On Tue, 22 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The Hermit Hacker writes: > > > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.1.2 ... > > > > Just want a second opinion before I ann

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak ...

2001-05-23 Thread Tom Lane
The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd check. But the postgresql ftp site appears to be broken for the past >> few days. > > broken how? I just connected into it ... Maybe you did, but no one else can. ftp.postgresql.org has said 530-The maximum number of concurrent conne

Re: [HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak...

2001-05-22 Thread The Hermit Hacker
broken how? I just connected into it ... On Tue, 22 May 2001, Karl DeBisschop wrote: > The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.1.2 ... > > > > Just want a second opinion before I announce more publicly ... > > I'd check. But the postgresql ftp site appears to be

[HACKERS] Not released yet, but could someone take a quick peak ...

2001-05-22 Thread The Hermit Hacker
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v7.1.2 ... Just want a second opinion before I announce more publicly ... Thanks ... Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary: scrappy@{freeb