On 10/19/2014 11:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
Attached
Have you looked at this?
Committed now, thanks.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
Attached
Have you looked at this?
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 10/10/2014 02:04 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
I found a reference made obsolete by commit 9e85183b, which is from
way back in 2000.
comparetup_index_btree() says:
/*
* This is similar to _bt_tuplecompare(), but we have already done the
* index_getattr calls for the first column, and we need
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Yeah. Want to write that into a patch?
Attached.
--
Peter Geoghegan
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c
b/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c
new file mode 100644
index 8e57505..2d15da0
***
I found a reference made obsolete by commit 9e85183b, which is from
way back in 2000.
comparetup_index_btree() says:
/*
* This is similar to _bt_tuplecompare(), but we have already done the
* index_getattr calls for the first column, and we need to keep track of
* whether any null fields are
