[HACKERS] Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions

2009-03-05 Thread Joshua Tolley
I've recently run into a problem with a datatype whose operators are based on functions not marked IMMUTABLE. Although there might be good reasons to have such a thing, it seems like it might be a valuable warning message if you create an operator based on an non-IMMUTABLE function. Comments? -

Re: [HACKERS] Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions

2009-03-05 Thread Jeff Davis
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 11:27 -0700, Joshua Tolley wrote: I've recently run into a problem with a datatype whose operators are based on functions not marked IMMUTABLE. Although there might be good reasons to have such a thing, it seems like it might be a valuable warning message if you create an

Re: [HACKERS] Operators based on non-IMMUTABLE functions

2009-03-05 Thread Tom Lane
Joshua Tolley eggyk...@gmail.com writes: I've recently run into a problem with a datatype whose operators are based on functions not marked IMMUTABLE. Although there might be good reasons to have such a thing, it seems like it might be a valuable warning message if you create an operator based