Joshua Tolley writes:
> I noticed the following out-of-date bits in a comment in xlogutils.c:
Removing the comment altogether doesn't seem appropriate. I changed it
to
* (Getting the buffer lock is not really necessary during single-process
* crash recovery, but some subroutines such as MarkB
I noticed the following out-of-date bits in a comment in xlogutils.c:
* LockBuffer(buffer, BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE), for reading from the main
* fork.
*
- * (Getting the lock is not really necessary, since we expect that this is
- * only used during single-process XLOG replay, but some su
