Re: [HACKERS] Overhauling our interrupt handling

2015-01-15 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Hello, > > I think I should finilize my commitfest item for this issue, with > > .. "Rejected"? > > Fine with me. done. > > > 0001: Replace walsender's latch with the general shared latch. > > > > > > New patch that removes ImmediateInteruptOK behaviour from > > > walsender. I > > >

Re: [HACKERS] Overhauling our interrupt handling

2015-01-15 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2015-01-15 15:05:08 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Hello, I'd synced up this at last. > > I think I should finilize my commitfest item for this issue, with > .. "Rejected"? Fine with me. > > All the patches in the series up to 0008 hav ecommit messages providing > > more detail. A sho

Re: [HACKERS] Overhauling our interrupt handling

2015-01-14 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Hello, I'd synced up this at last. I think I should finilize my commitfest item for this issue, with .. "Rejected"? > This mail is a answer to > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20150110022542.GF12509%40alap3.anarazel.de > but I decided that it's a good go move it into a new thread since