Re: [HACKERS] PG process architecture

2006-01-14 Thread Denis Lussier
  EnterpriseDB is a clone AND a fork.  :-)  We work hard to free customers from Oracle vendor lock-in AND stay up with the latest releases and patches of Postgres AND don't break any Postgres native and/or ANSI functionality.   --Denis Lussier   Founder & CTO   www.EnterpriseDB.com     On 1/11/0

Re: [HACKERS] PG process architecture

2006-01-11 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Milen Kulev wrote: Hi Harris, from oracle DBA point of view Enterprise DB is VERY cool. My boss will be very happy to hear that there a way to get (paid) support for a PG DB. There several highly qualified support vendors for PostgreSQL: SRA America Pervasive and ourselves, the only dedica

Re: [HACKERS] PG process architecture

2006-01-11 Thread Milen Kulev
ce of PG (several times) to understand a little bit deeper the internal mechanics of PG. Regards. Milen. > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: "Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Milen Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] PG process archi

Re: [HACKERS] PG process architecture

2006-01-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Milen Kulev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My questions is: > Where PG is storing data dictionary information (coming form system pg_* > tables) while parsing the queries ? There's a limited-size "catalog cache" in each backend process, which might be the closest analogy to this. Offhand I thin

[HACKERS] PG process architecture

2006-01-11 Thread Milen Kulev
Hi listers, I am experienced Oracle DBA und now I was given a task to evaluate Postgresql. May first goal is to compare the architecture of Oracle and Postgres. After reading the fine manuals and several mailing lists, I have found that the following parameters are analogous in PG vs Oracle --