On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:57 AM, David Johnston
david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not the reading I want, and it's not the reading you want either,
but there is nothing in the existing text that justifies single
evaluation. So I think we'd be well advised to sit on our hands until
the
Hi all,
Please find the attachment.
By my friend asking, for convenience,
support to define multi variables in single PL/pgSQL line.
Like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION try_mutlivardef() RETURNS text AS $$
DECLARE
local_a, local_b, local_c text := 'a1';
BEGIN
return local_a || local_b
Hello
+ it is natural in almost all languages including ADA
- it increases a distance between PL/pgSQL and PL/SQL
I am don't think, so this feature is necessary, but I am not against it.
Regards
Pavel
2014-06-13 9:20 GMT+02:00 Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Please find
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com wrote:
By my friend asking, for convenience,
support to define multi variables in single PL/pgSQL line.
Like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION try_mutlivardef() RETURNS text AS $$
DECLARE
local_a, local_b, local_c text
Hi
On 14/06/13 16:20, Quan Zongliang wrote:
Hi all,
Please find the attachment.
By my friend asking, for convenience,
support to define multi variables in single PL/pgSQL line.
Like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION try_mutlivardef() RETURNS text AS $$
DECLARE
local_a, local_b,
2014-06-13 9:41 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com
wrote:
By my friend asking, for convenience,
support to define multi variables in single PL/pgSQL line.
Like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
On 06/13/2014 03:42 PM, Ian Barwick wrote:
Hi
On 14/06/13 16:20, Quan Zongliang wrote:
Hi all,
Please find the attachment.
By my friend asking, for convenience,
support to define multi variables in single PL/pgSQL line.
Like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION try_mutlivardef() RETURNS text
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-13 9:41 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com
wrote:
By my friend asking, for convenience,
support to define multi
Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com writes:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION try_mutlivardef() RETURNS text AS $$
DECLARE
local_a, local_b, local_c text := 'a1';
BEGIN
return local_a || local_b || local_c;
end;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
This does not seem like a terribly good idea from here.
We can disallow custom initialization when when variables are declared as
list.
Quan' example is 100% valid in SQL/PSM and what I read about ADA then in
ADA too.
Regards
Pavel
2014-06-13 16:04 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Quan Zongliang quanzongli...@gmail.com writes:
CREATE OR
On 2014-06-13 16:12:36 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Quan' example is 100% valid in SQL/PSM and what I read about ADA then in
ADA too.
So what? plpgsql is neither language and this doesn't seem to be the way
to make them actually closer (which I doubt would be a good idea in the
first place).
2014-06-13 16:17 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com:
On 2014-06-13 16:12:36 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Quan' example is 100% valid in SQL/PSM and what I read about ADA then in
ADA too.
So what? plpgsql is neither language and this doesn't seem to be the way
to make them
Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2014-06-13 16:12:36 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Quan' example is 100% valid in SQL/PSM and what I read about ADA then in
ADA too.
So what? plpgsql is neither language and this doesn't seem to be the way
to make them actually closer (which I
Tom Lane-2 wrote
Andres Freund lt;
andres@
gt; writes:
On 2014-06-13 16:12:36 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Quan' example is 100% valid in SQL/PSM and what I read about ADA then in
ADA too.
So what? plpgsql is neither language and this doesn't seem to be the way
to make them actually
David G Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com writes:
Tom Lane-2 wrote
At the very least I think we should stay away from this syntax until
the SQL committee understand it better than they evidently do today.
I don't want to implement it and then get caught by a future
clarification that
Quan Zongliang wrote:
Hi all,
Please find the attachment.
By my friend asking, for convenience,
support to define multi variables in single PL/pgSQL line.
Like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION try_mutlivardef() RETURNS text AS $$
DECLARE
local_a, local_b, local_c text := 'a1';
2014-06-13 17:32 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
David G Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com writes:
Tom Lane-2 wrote
At the very least I think we should stay away from this syntax until
the SQL committee understand it better than they evidently do today.
I don't want to implement
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
David G Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com writes:
Tom Lane-2 wrote
At the very least I think we should stay away from this syntax until
the SQL committee understand it better than they evidently do today.
I don't want
18 matches
Mail list logo
