Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:53:42 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >the extra level of struct naming for pd_opaque has no obvious
> >usefulness.
> >
> >> [...] sh
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:53:42 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>the extra level of struct naming for pd_opaque has no obvious
>usefulness.
>
>> [...] should I post a patch that puts pagesize directly into
>> PageHeaderData?
>
>If you're so inclined. Given that pd_opaque is hidden in thos
Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is od_pagesize in any way more or less opaque than pd_lower, pd_upper,
> pd_special, etc? If it is, why?
I surmise that there was once some idea of supporting multiple page
sizes simultaneously, but it's not real clear why the macros
PageGetPageSize/P
