On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Alexander Korotkov
aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that such parameters don't have optimal value for all the cases;
What makes you think that?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Alexander Korotkov
aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that such parameters don't have optimal value for all the cases;
What makes you think that?
Actually the whole signature method is
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Greg Stark gsst...@mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Alexander Korotkov
aekorot...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that such parameters don't have optimal value for all the cases;
Hi hackers,
I found that some parameters of GiST implementation are builin in the code.
For example, following can be found in the backend/utils/adt/tsgistidx.c:
#define SIGLENINT 31/* 121 = key will toast, so it will not
work
* !!! */
#define
